Hister vs ArchiveBox
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Hister compared with ArchiveBox
| Detail | Hister | ArchiveBox |
|---|
| What it does | Your Own Search Engine
| Open-source self-hosted web archiving
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Established
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | free
| free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Browser extension indexing
- Local file watching
- Full-text search with field filters
- Multiple search interfaces
- Stored page previews
- Website crawler
- Content extractors
- Optional semantic search
| - Save bookmarks and URLs
- Tag and search captures
- Auto-extract media to standard formats
- Browser extension
- REST API
- Import from multiple sources
- Capture in multiple formats
- Web UI and CLI
- Mobile apps for iOS and Android
- Static exports
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No telemetry or mandatory cloud requirements
- Full content preservation with readable previews
- Auditable free software under AGPLv3
- Search from multiple interfaces
| - Free and open-source with no analytics
- Full control of data on your own infrastructure
- Designed to preserve content for 100+ years
- Supports TLSNotary proofs for content authenticity
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 31 ● no change since last check | 57 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 28 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 42 | 33 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 833 | 1341 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Hister More alternatives to ArchiveBox